CEURART submission formatting guidelines. The length of the paper should be at most 5 pages, everything included (references etc.).
The paper should contain at least the following parts:
Title, authors, and affiliations;
An abstract (of no more than 100 words);
An introduction section, which, among others, should highlight the significance of the tool or resource to the BPM field;
A section discussing the innovations of the tool or resource to the BPM community and its main characteristics or features;
For tool demonstrations:
A section describing the maturity of the tool. For this section, one could provide a brief description of case studies performed using the tool, provide scalability data or pointers indicating where readers can find more information about these case studies;
A link to a video that screencasts and demonstrates the tool, preferably including voice, which must not be longer than 4 minutes;
A link to the tool (e.g., a link to a web page where to download or use the tool). If the tool requires a license, a paper’s or tutorial’s appendix should describe how to obtain a (temporary) license. The procedure to obtain the license must not disclose the identity of the reviewers. The appendix will not be included in the final version for the proceedings, if the demo is accepted. The reviewers must be able to execute and understand the tool, a short “get it started” is recommended.
For resource expositions:
A section describing the data model and schema of the resource. The reader should understand from this section how to interpret and gather information from the exposed resource;
A section describing a preliminary analysis conducted on, or with the aid of, the resource. For this section, it is necessary that the procedure to obtain the results is clearly linked to the exposed resource;
A publicly accessible and persistently available link (e.g., GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, Zenodo, B2share) to download and cite the resource. The web page must not require a registration procedure that unveils the identity of reviewers. In addition, it has to contain:
All demo and resource submissions will be reviewed by the Demos & Resources Program Committee. The Committee will also vote on the best contribution to receive the “BPM 2025 Best Demos and Resources Award”.
Accepted demo and resource papers will be submitted for publication to CEUR (indexed by DBLP and SCOPUS) and posted along with their videos on the BPM 2025 web page.